Is Electric Flight the Future? A Pilot's perspective on Sustainable Aviation
- Harshdeep Singh
- Mar 1
- 10 min read
Updated: 14 minutes ago
Aviation has come a long way from the days of the Wright brothers’ rickety flyer. We now have sleek jets piercing through the sky at near supersonic speeds, carrying hundreds of passengers across the world in mere hours. I am personally a huge admirer of the Gulfstream jets and the mighty Airbus A350. But with all this progress and wonders comes a massive problem—pollution. As the world becomes more environmentally conscious, the aviation industry is under pressure to clean up its act. And so, the buzzword of the decade: electric flight.
Electric aircraft, including eVTOLs (electric vertical takeoff and landing vehicles), are being hailed as the future of sustainable aviation. But is it really that simple? Are we on the brink of a quiet, clean, battery-powered revolution in the skies, or are we just slapping a green label on another flawed technology? Buckle up as I take you through the highs and lows of electric flight—no seatbelt sign required.
The Promise of Electric Aviation
Imagine a world where airplanes hum instead of roar, where takeoffs feel like floating rather than thundering, and where flight emissions are practically nonexistent. Sounds like science fiction, right? Well, not quite.
Electric aircraft are already in the works. Companies like Eviation, Pipistrel, and even aerospace giants like Airbus and Boeing are investing in battery-powered planes. The idea is simple: replace fuel-guzzling engines with electric motors powered by batteries, just like a Tesla—but with wings.
These advancements promise quieter, more sustainable flights, making air travel more eco-friendly and potentially reducing operating costs for airlines. While current battery technology limits the range of electric planes, hybrid solutions and improvements in energy storage could soon make them viable for regional travel. Governments and aviation authorities are also pushing for greener alternatives, providing incentives for research and development. The shift to electric aviation won’t happen overnight, but with innovation accelerating, the dream of clean, efficient air travel is closer to reality than ever before.
eVTOLs- The Flying Taxis
If you've ever been stuck in traffic and thought, “I wish I could just fly over all this,” eVTOLs might be your dream come true. eVTOL stands for "Electric Vertical Take-off and Landing. These futuristic vehicles are designed for short city-to-city hops, offering an alternative to cars, helicopters, and even trains. Companies like Joby Aviation, Archer, and Lilium are working hard to make these sky taxis a reality.
The appeal? They’re electric, quieter than helicopters, and theoretically more affordable. Imagine ordering an air taxi like an Uber—except instead of waiting in traffic, you’re gliding above skyscrapers in a sleek, electric aircraft. Sounds cool, right?
eVTOLs are designed to take off and land vertically, eliminating the need for long runways. They could drastically cut down commute times, reduce urban congestion, and lower carbon emissions. While battery limitations, infrastructure challenges, and regulatory approvals still stand in the way, major cities worldwide are already planning for eVTOL integration. Companies are testing prototypes, refining safety features, and collaborating with aviation authorities to make flying taxis a mainstream reality. If progress continues at this pace, we could see commercial eVTOL services within the next decade. The future of urban mobility is taking off—literally.
Challenges: The Dark Side of Batteries
Now, before we all start selling our gas-guzzling jets and embracing the electric revolution, let’s talk about the elephant in the hangar—batteries.
Batteries may be the beating heart of electric flight, but they come with their own set of quirks. First, they’re heavy—ridiculously heavy. Unlike jet fuel, which burns off as you fly (making the plane lighter), batteries remain the same weight throughout the journey. This means an electric aircraft carries the same load from takeoff to touchdown, reducing efficiency and making long-haul flights a distant dream (for now).
Then there’s the issue of charging. Recharging a giant aircraft battery isn’t like plugging in your phone and grabbing a coffee while you wait. Even with the best fast-charging technology today, it takes hours to fully recharge an aircraft battery—whereas refueling a jet with aviation fuel takes just minutes. Imagine the chaos at a busy airport if every plane had to sit at the gate for hours just to juice up!
And what about battery swaps? In theory, it sounds like a quick fix—just pop in a fresh one and take off again. But in reality, swapping out a battery pack the size of a small car every time a plane lands isn’t exactly practical. We’re talking massive infrastructure changes, specialized ground crews, and a whole new logistical headache.
Electric aircraft would surely be not as big as the heavy jets we fly today like the one seen above however that gives you an idea that at the very least, it's not going to be the same as swapping your antique clock's batteries.
That’s not to say electric flight is doomed. Far from it! Battery technology is improving every year, and as energy density increases and charging solutions evolve, we might just crack the code for sustainable air travel. But for now, we’re still facing some turbulence on the road (or should I say, runway?) to an all-electric future.
Mining and Environmental Concerns
But the biggest problem? Mining. The lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements needed for batteries don’t magically appear in a lab. They have to be dug up—often from environmentally damaging mines in countries with questionable labor practices. The irony is almost painful: we’re trying to save the environment by using materials that are destroying it.
Mining for these materials isn’t just about a few holes in the ground. It involves large-scale excavation, deforestation, and massive water consumption, often in regions already struggling with environmental challenges. Cobalt mining, for example, has been linked to habitat destruction and unethical labor practices, including child labor in some parts of the world. And let’s not forget lithium—extraction from salt flats can drain local water supplies, harming both ecosystems and communities that rely on them.
Then there’s the issue of battery production and disposal. Manufacturing batteries requires energy—lots of it—often from fossil-fuel-powered plants. So, while electric planes might be emission-free in flight, their overall environmental impact isn’t as squeaky clean as it seems. And once a battery reaches the end of its life? Recycling is still a developing science, with many batteries ending up in landfills, leaching toxic chemicals into the earth.
That’s not to say electric aviation is a lost cause. Researchers are working on more sustainable battery solutions, including solid-state batteries, improved recycling methods, and even alternative energy sources like hydrogen fuel cells. The goal is clear: to make flying cleaner without shifting the environmental burden elsewhere. But until then, we have some work to do before electric flight can truly call itself "green."
Hydrogen-Powered Planes: The Future or Just a Fantasy?
So if batteries don't sound astonishing, what about the compound which is being widely used in today's world? Hydrogen isn’t a new player in the world of propulsion as well—it has been powering rockets for decades. NASA and other space agencies use liquid hydrogen (LH2) as a rocket fuel, combining it with liquid oxygen (LOX) to create one of the most powerful and efficient fuel sources available. The Space Shuttle and the Saturn V rocket, which took astronauts to the Moon, both used hydrogen-powered engines.
So, if hydrogen is good enough for space travel, why not aviation? The key difference is scale and practicality. Rockets burn through fuel in minutes and can afford the extra weight of cryogenic storage tanks. Airliners, on the other hand, need a solution that is safe, lightweight, and efficient over long durations. On the surface, hydrogen seems like a dream fuel. When used in fuel cells, it produces only water vapor as a byproduct—no carbon emissions, no soot, just clean energy. It’s also incredibly energy-dense by weight, meaning it has the potential to power long-haul flights without the weight problem of batteries. Major players like Airbus are already working on hydrogen-powered aircraft designs, hoping to roll them out by 2035.
But here’s the catch—hydrogen isn’t exactly easy to work with. First, storing hydrogen requires extremely low temperatures (-253°C) or high-pressure tanks, both of which add significant complexity and cost. Unlike traditional jet fuel, which can be stored in an aircraft’s wings, hydrogen tanks take up far more space, cutting into passenger and cargo capacity.
Then there’s the production challenge. While hydrogen is abundant, most of it today is produced from natural gas, which still generates carbon emissions. Truly “green” hydrogen, made through electrolysis using renewable energy, is still expensive and not widely available. Scaling up production to support aviation would require a massive overhaul of our energy infrastructure.
Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF): The Middle Ground?
While electric and hydrogen aircraft are still in development, Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is already here and being used in commercial flights. But can it truly be the bridge to a greener aviation industry?
SAF is a type of fuel made from renewable sources like used cooking oil, plant materials, and even waste gases. The major advantage? It can be used in existing aircraft engines with little to no modification. This makes SAF the most immediate way to reduce carbon emissions without waiting for entirely new technologies. Airlines like United, Lufthansa, and British Airways are already incorporating SAF into their fuel mix, and some flights have been powered by 100% SAF.
The benefits are clear: SAF can reduce carbon emissions by up to 80% over its lifecycle compared to conventional jet fuel. Since it works with current aircraft and infrastructure, it doesn’t require the massive overhauls that electric or hydrogen planes do. Plus, it can be blended with traditional jet fuel, allowing for a gradual transition.
However, SAF isn’t a perfect solution. First, it’s expensive—up to three to five times the cost of regular jet fuel. This cost is expected to decrease as production scales up, but for now, it remains a barrier to widespread adoption. There’s also a supply issue. Currently, SAF makes up less than 1% of global aviation fuel consumption. Producing enough to meet demand requires significant investment in biofuel refineries and access to sustainable feed-stocks. Critics argue that large-scale biofuel production could compete with food crops or lead to deforestation, potentially offsetting its environmental benefits.
So, is SAF the ultimate solution? Probably not. But as a short- to medium-term fix, it provides an essential stepping stone toward cleaner aviation while the industry works on more transformative technologies.
Infrastructure Challenges: Are We Ready for Green Aviation?
Even if we perfect electric, hydrogen, or SAF-powered aircraft, there’s another major hurdle—the infrastructure to support them. Are airports, airlines, and energy grids truly prepared for the transition to sustainable aviation? The short answer: not yet.
Let’s start with airports. Most airports today are built around traditional fuel-based operations. Refueling is fast and efficient because jet fuel is easy to store, transport, and pump into planes. But electric and hydrogen aircraft would require a complete redesign of fueling infrastructure. Airports would need charging stations capable of delivering massive amounts of electricity in a short time or hydrogen storage facilities with strict safety measures. Neither of these exists at a scale that can support widespread adoption.
Then there’s the question of power. Imagine an airport where multiple electric aircraft need to charge at once. The energy demand would be astronomical, far beyond what most current power grids can handle. Renewable energy sources like solar and wind could help, but integrating them into an already overloaded grid is a challenge.
Hydrogen infrastructure presents an even bigger issue. Producing and transporting liquid hydrogen requires specialized pipelines, deep freezing storage, and refueling trucks that don’t yet exist at most airports. Setting up this infrastructure would cost billions and take years to implement.
Maintenance and training are another factor. Aircraft mechanics and ground crews are trained to handle traditional aviation fuel and jet engines. Working with high-voltage electric systems or hydrogen requires entirely new skills, meaning airlines and airports must invest in massive re-training programs.
In short, sustainable aviation isn’t just about the planes—it’s about a complete transformation of how airports and airlines operate. And while change is coming, it’s going to take serious investment and coordination to make it a reality.
Passenger Perspective: Will Travelers Pay for Sustainability?
Sustainable aviation sounds great—but are passengers willing to pay extra for it? Airlines have been testing the waters with greener travel options, but the response from travelers has been mixed.
On one hand, surveys show that many passengers care about climate change and want to reduce their carbon footprint. Some airlines, like KLM and Lufthansa, offer passengers the option to pay extra for Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) offsets, helping fund greener flights. And in theory, if enough travelers demand sustainable options, airlines will be more motivated to invest in green technology.
But here’s the reality—cost matters. The airline industry is highly price-sensitive, and most passengers still choose the cheapest ticket available (I do the same). Sustainable travel options often come with a premium price tag, and not everyone is willing (or able) to pay more. If an electric or hydrogen-powered ticket costs $50-$100 more than a regular one, how many people will still book it?
Then there’s the issue of flight frequency and convenience. Many sustainable aviation solutions, like electric planes, may initially only work for short-haul flights. If passengers have to take multiple connecting flights instead of a single direct flight, will they still opt for the greener option?
Airlines also face the challenge of balancing sustainability with profitability. Investing in SAF, electric aircraft, or hydrogen infrastructure costs billions—and if travelers aren’t willing to pay more, airlines will be reluctant to make the switch.
Ultimately, for sustainable aviation to truly take off, prices need to be competitive with traditional flights. Governments may need to step in with subsidies, and technology must advance to lower costs. Until then, the question remains—will passengers support greener flights, or will price always be the deciding factor?
So, What’s the Future?
Am I saying electric flight is a lost cause? Absolutely not! It has huge potential, especially for short-haul flights and urban air mobility. For longer journeys, hybrid-electric systems and hydrogen fuel cells might help bridge the gap.
But let’s be real—there’s no magic switch to sustainable aviation. Batteries still need a diet, hydrogen needs better storage, and SAF needs to stop acting like caviar with its price tag. The good news? Progress is happening, and the industry is moving toward a cleaner, greener future.
Sure, it won’t happen overnight. Airports will need serious upgrades, airlines will have to rethink their fleets, and passengers might need to accept that a greener future costs more than a budget airline ticket to paradise. But change is coming—and soon, the idea of belching out tons of CO₂ at 35,000 feet will feel as outdated as smoking on airplanes.
Final thoughts
While we’re not ditching jet fuel tomorrow, the shift has begun. The sky is changing—one slightly quieter, less polluting flight at a time. Buckle up—the future of flight is gearing up to be electric (or at least electric-ish), revolutionizing how we power the skies with sustainability and innovation.
So, is it safe to say that electric flight is inevitable? It’s certainly a part of it. But until battery technology takes a giant leap forward, jet engines aren’t going anywhere. In the meantime, let’s keep dreaming, keep innovating, and maybe—just maybe—one day, we’ll fly guilt-free.
What are your thoughts on electric aviation? Are you ready to board an electric plane, or are you still clinging to the roar of a jet engine? Let me know in the comments below!
Comments